دانلود مقاله ترجمه شده مباني تابع توليد كل تا چه حد مناسب هستند؟

The aggregate production function has been subject to a number of criticisms ever since its first empirical estimation by Cobb and Douglas in the 1920s, notably the problems raised by aggregation and the Cambridge Capital Theory Controversies. There is a further criticism due initially to Phelps Brown (and elaborated, in particular, by Simon and Shaikh) which is not so widely known. This critique is that because at the aggregate level only value data can be used to estimate production function, this means that the estimated parameters of the production function are merely capturing an underlying accounting identity. Hence, no reliance can be placed on estimates of, for example, the elasticity of substitution as reflecting technological parameters. The argument also explains why good statistical fits of the aggregate production functions are obtained, notwithstanding the difficulties posed by the aggregation problem and the Cambridge Capital Controversies noted above. This paper outlines and assesses the Phelps Brown critique and its extensions. In particular, it considers some possible objections to his argument and demonstrates that they are not significant. It is concluded that the theoretical basis of the aggregate production function is problematic

Contents

1. Introduction

2. The Cobb-Douglas Production Function and the Accounting Identity

3. The Problems of Using Monetary Values at Constant Prices as Proxies for Quantities

4. Micro-production Functions and the Aggregate Cobb-Douglas “Production Function”

5. Why Has the Critique been so Widely Ignored?

6. Conclusions